For the past two years I've systematically measured the consumption of bird foods here in the land of Cary BirdCam. The basic methodology is simple: measure each amount added to feeders. And now that 2012 is complete I can start crunching the numbers and evaluating patterns. The big story in 2012 was reduced consumption of the big ticket items, and greatly reduced consumption at that.
For one, I put out 130.3 pounds' worth of sunflower seed this past year than the one before---a 28% reduction. For those in the cheap seats, that's more than three 40# sacks, or a savings of over $129 US. Similarly, safflower seed consumption was down 73.7# and suet 29.2#. And even the small fry stuff like peanut butter, peanuts and suet nuggets was off pace by similar margins. All in all, I realized something like $350 in savings this past year. That's wonderful news: I still got the birds, and I saved big bucks.
So what's going on? If I saw this drop only in sunflower seed, I would unhesitatingly claim the benefits of managing squirrels. But that's plainly not the case. Birds are not likely to be eating less per bird---in terms of fewer calories per day. Can I assume there are fewer hungry birds, or at least fewer visits per bird to the feeders? Maybe. Indeed I have seen fewer goldfinches; that's one seedeater. But there's also an argument that my anti-squirrel measures have tended to lock out larger birds from most of the seed and suet feeders, and just possibly this is the major cause. Unfortunately, I don't really know. I would need to have solid comparative visit data by species for both years.
Well, no matter. I have plenty of birds here, and I have more greenbacks in the wallet. And at the end of the day, that's really all that matters. But I think I want to see data for 2013...so the experiment shall continue.
Thursday, January 3, 2013
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment